Aloy Ejimakor, lawyer to Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), says there is no abnormal delay in his client’s appeal process.
In a statement on Wednesday, Ejimakor urged the public to
ignore speculation suggesting that the appeal may have been abandoned.
Ejimakor said the appeal, which challenges Kanu’s conviction, is already underway and progressing in line with laid-down legal procedures.
“As already known, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s Notice (and Grounds) of appeal was filed in February 2026. This is the first and most important step that activated the appeal,” he said.
Ejimakor explained that the compilation and transmission of the record of appeal, which he described as a key stage in appellate proceedings, has been completed by the registrar of the federal high court in Abuja.
According to him, the process has moved to the exchange of briefs of argument between Kanu’s legal team and the federal government.
“The next visible milestone is the transmission of the record of appeal (which has been done), followed by the exchange of briefs, which is in process,” he said.
Ejimakor added that the appeal is “already live”, stressing that the filing of the notice in February effectively set the process in motion.
“It is noteworthy that the appeal is already ‘live’ – the filing of the Notice in February 2026 started the clock,” he said.
He said under established procedure, Kanu’s legal team is expected to file its brief of argument within 45 days of receiving the record, after which the prosecution will respond within 30 days.
The lawyer noted that the court will rely primarily on these written briefs, while oral arguments at the hearing will only serve to clarify issues raised.
He also clarified that no fresh evidence or oral testimony will be taken at the appellate stage.
Ejimakor urged the public to disregard rumours and misconceptions about the appeal process, noting that it follows a structuredand sequential path.
“People should therefore focus on these clear, sequential stages rather than daily rumors or believing that the appeal process will Follow the same pattern and procedure seen in the High Court before Justice Omotosho,” he said.
He added that the process could take several months, although terrorism-related cases are typically prioritised for faster hearing.
“This is the standard, transparent roadmap laid down by Nigerian law, and MNK’s appeal cannot be any different. So, the appeal is progressing exactly as the rules require – one procedural step at a time,” Ejimakor said.
BACKGROUND
In November 2025, James Omotosho, the presiding judge, sentenced the IPOB leader to life imprisonment for terrorism charges.
Kanu was handed life imprisonment for counts one, four, five and six of the seven-count charges.
The IPOB leader got 20 years and five years’ imprisonment on counts three and seven, respectively.
Kanu is currently serving his sentence at the correctional centre in Sokoto.
In an appeal filed on February 4 at the court of appeal in Abuja, Kanu asked the appellate court to quash his terrorism conviction and the sentence.
The IPOB leader argued that the life imprisonment sentence was imposed without allocutus — a statement by the defendant explaining why the
court should not impose the maximum sentence for the crime.
“An Order of the Honourable Court of Appeal quashing the conviction of the Appellant in all the counts in the charge No:
FHC/ABJ/CR/383/2015 by the Federal High Court Judge,” part of the relief sought
reads.
“An Order of the Honourable Court of Appeal quashing, reversing and setting aside the sentences/punishment imposed on the Appellant by the Honourable trial Federal High Court Judge in the charge no.FHC/ABJ/CR/383/2015.
“An Order of the Honourable Court of Appeal discharging and acquitting the Appellant in respect of all the counts in charge No.
FHC/ABJ/CR/383/2015.”
Aprokorepublic